Itemoids

Six

'Daisy Jones & the Six' turns a fictional band into a four-star soap opera

CNN

www.cnn.com › 2023 › 03 › 03 › entertainment › daisy-jones-and-the-six-review › index.html

As soap operas set against the world of sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll go, "Daisy Jones & the Six" is a by-no-means groundbreaking but still-enjoyable account of the best band that never existed, charting its meteoric rise and just-as-abrupt fall. Credit that in part to the cast, starting with Riley Keough, who does her rock lineage and grandpa Elvis proud by belting out the group's songs.

What Happened to the Recession?

The Atlantic

www.theatlantic.com › newsletters › archive › 2023 › 03 › recession-economists-wrong › 673252

Economists have been talking about a looming recession for months. Why hasn’t it happened yet?

But first, here are three new stories from The Atlantic:

How do you stop lawmakers from destroying the law? What losing my two children taught me about grief The FBI desperately wants to let Trump off the hook.

What Recession?

According to the predictions of many economists last summer and fall, America should be in a recession right now. But as my colleague Annie Lowrey wrote in The Atlantic today, the facts reveal a very different state of affairs:

Unemployment is holding steady at its lowest rate in half a century. Layoffs are not increasing. The economy is growing at a decent clip. Wages are rising, and households are not reducing their spending. Corporate profits are near an all-time high. Consumers report feeling confident.

“So why,” Annie asks, “were forecasters so certain about a recession last year, leading so many people to feel so pessimistic?” The main reason the recession hasn’t arrived is that businesses and consumers have proved resilient, she explains. And that resilience is in part due to government policy: “Washington fought the last recession well enough that it seems to have staved off the next one, at least for some period of time.”

But that outcome—or any economic outcome, really—is very hard for human beings to predict. The economy is huge, and our knowledge of it is imperfect, Annie reminds us. And there’s no rich sample of past recessions to study—the United States has been through just 12 in the post–World War II period.

The available data in 2022 gave forecasters clear reasons to expect a recession: The global economy was slowing down, and interest rates were going up as part of the Federal Reserve’s efforts to tackle inflation. But though in the past that combination of factors has been troubling for the U.S. economy, that wasn’t the case this time. That’s in part because of a series of bottlenecks and shortages in our strange COVID-era economy but also, and more importantly, because “the American labor market turned out to be much stronger than economists had realized,” Annie explains:

When COVID hit, the federal government spent trillions on small-business support and cash payments to families, meaning that low-income households did not reduce their spending despite the jobless rate reaching nearly 15 percent. Indeed, they actually increased their spending. What’s more, the strong policy response had the (honestly, a bit weird) effect of boosting private-sector wages: Workers dislocated from their jobs scored significant raises when they went back to work. At the same time, because of widespread labor shortages, businesses have proved loath to let workers go.

Hearing about the American economy’s resilience can feel confusing when you keep seeing news updates about layoffs in the tech and media sectors. As my colleague Derek Thompson put it in January: “These layoff announcements have become depressingly common, even rote. But they’re also kind of mysterious,” given the fact that the overall unemployment rate in the U.S. is the lowest it’s been thus far in the 21st century.

Derek’s January article offers a few helpful frameworks for thinking about these layoffs in the context of an otherwise strong American economy. But I’ll leave you with one explanation worth remembering: the idea of “layoff contagion.” Annie elaborated on that concept in an article last month, pointing out that many of the tech companies (except Twitter) that laid off employees in recent months are actually making money. “Those firms, in other words, did not need to let so many workers go; they chose to,” Annie writes. “And they did so because other tech firms were making the same choice.”

Economic conditions have become an excuse executives use to justify their strategic decisions, she argues:

Copycat layoffs also let executives cite challenging business conditions as a justification for cuts, rather than their own boneheaded strategic decisions. In this scenario, the problem isn’t that corporate leadership poured billions of dollars into a quixotic new venture or hired hundreds of what ended up being redundant employees. It’s not that the C-suite misunderstood the competitive environment, necessitating a costly and painful readjustment. It’s Jay Powell! It’s a COVID-related reversion to the mean! Who could have known?

Although recent layoffs don’t imply a recession, an economic slowdown could still be ahead of us, Annie noted in today’s article: Wage growth is stagnating, and inflation remains high. “It might turn out that forecasts of a recession were not entirely wrong—just early.”

Related:

The reason the recession hasn’t happened yet A recession is not inevitable.

Today’s News

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken said the Biden administration sees “zero evidence” that Russian President Vladimir Putin is prepared to engage in serious peace talks. At least 43 people were killed in a head-on train collision in Greece. Eli Lilly announced that it will cut the price for its most commonly prescribed form of insulin by 70 percent and expand a program that caps patient costs for the drug.

Dispatches

Up for Debate: Readers discuss their relationship with religion. The Weekly Planet: The world is finally cracking down on “greenwashing,” Emma Marris writes.

Explore all of our newsletters here.

Evening Read

What Active-Shooter Trainings Steal From Synagogues

By Daniel Torday

On a Sunday late in November, I spent the day at my synagogue in Philadelphia. The Germantown Jewish Centre, where I am a member, was holding a day-long security training on what to do if an active shooter came to our community’s home, and I felt compelled to attend.

The reason for the training is obvious: For a few years now, this country has been experiencing a marked, measurable uptick in anti-Semitic hate speech and even hate crimes. Fear of these kinds of attacks in synagogues is not wholly new, of course; I remember my Hungarian grandparents, Holocaust survivors, looking pale and stiff at my bar mitzvah, the first time they’d been in a Jewish house of worship in 30 years. But the proliferation of guns and the general air of rancor in the United States have made Jewish communities feel more on edge today. Even so, I’ve long been ambivalent about the effects of active-shooter drills in general, and of increasing security at houses of worship more specifically—feeling, at times, that in doing so, we lose something essential. This training would give me a chance to figure out what—and why.

So I went. Maybe I’d learn something.

Read the full article.

More From The Atlantic

The glossy, tiresome melodrama of Daisy Jones & the Six We have a mink problem. Winners of the 2022 World Nature Photography Awards

Culture Break

Bella Ramsey and Storm Reid in "The Last of Us"

Read. “Flesh,” a new poem by Deborah Landau.

“We will miss the ice storm, we’ll be gone before the blizzard, / we’ll lie down in the dark forever just bones.”

Watch. Catch up on HBO’s The Last of Us—and then read Shirley Li’s piece on how the show cherishes a bygone world.

Play our daily crossword.

P.S.

If you’re interested in diving deeper into Annie’s work, she has an archive of great stories about American economy and society. But today I want to recommend her 2018 classic on the small town in Arkansas where residents used to throw turkeys out of a plane on Thanksgiving (remember, turkeys do not fly). Sure, it’s a Thanksgiving story, but it’s worth reading anytime, even on the first day of March.

— Isabel

The Glossy, Tiresome Melodrama of Daisy Jones & the Six

The Atlantic

www.theatlantic.com › culture › archive › 2023 › 03 › daisy-jones-six-taylor-jenkins-reid-amazon-show › 673247

Gossip can provide sensational grist for an entertainer’s appeal, for better or worse. But for singer-songwriters whose artistry is often diaristic, scandal is especially intriguing. They can’t release or play their music without the audience wondering how personal it is: Are these songs about them? Is what’s happening onstage actually a performance? How did they write these lyrics? What could they possibly get out of being the subjects of such attention?

Based on Taylor Jenkins Reid’s best-selling novel, Daisy Jones & the Six understands that musicians face inherent tension between their professional and private lives. The titular, fictional band at the center of the series is clearly modeled on Fleetwood Mac, the famed 1970s group whose most successful album arrived amid shocking relationship drama and internal feuding. But if fans felt drawn to Stevie Nicks and Lindsey Buckingham because their performances came with an air of mystery—were these exes gazing or glaring at each other, even decades after their breakup?—Daisy Jones strips away the mystique surrounding such dynamics.

[Read: Christine McVie’s most miraculous song]

Despite following a docuseries format akin to VH1’s Behind the Music, the Amazon drama is concerned less with examining the turmoil of the creative process than with depicting predictable love triangles that morph, across 10 episodes, into more complicated shapes. The show looks and sounds polished, beautifully capturing the earth-toned aesthetics of the era and producing an impressive album of earworms. But it’s a sun-kissed misfire that reduces what could have been a fascinating look at the profundity of artistic connection to a shallow soap opera. It’s a catchy tune, in other words, without a message.

When Daisy (played by Riley Keough), a solo artist with a sweet voice, meets Billy (Sam Claflin), the forceful frontman of a band building modest success, they clash immediately. Daisy thinks Billy’s writing is too sappy; Billy doesn’t think the band needs another member. That’s rich storytelling ground, but the show isn’t interested in how they overcome their differing approaches to their work. Although their mutual attraction is a significant part of the novel, the TV series further emphasizes their courtship, and most of the screen time is dedicated to contrived or complicated romantic entanglements that aren’t in the book at all. The band seems made up of love triangles: Karen (Suki Waterhouse), the keyboardist, competes against a fan for the affection of the guitarist, Graham (Will Harrison). Eddie (Josh Whitehouse), the group’s bassist, is in unrequited love with Billy’s wife, Camila (Camila Morrone). And Camila, who is wary of her husband’s lifestyle in the book but nevertheless trusts him, is rewritten here as a lurking threat to Billy and Daisy’s attachment.

[Read: 13 feel-good shows to watch this winter]

Any adaptation will make changes to fit a new medium, but Daisy Jones struggles to justify these alterations in particular. By playing up the romantic drama, the series glosses over the characters’ primary conflict: whether to choose a stable life away from the spotlight or stick with the hard-partying fun of being a rock-and-roll celebrity. Reid built emotional affairs in service of exploring that idea: Daisy, for example, represents how tempting being on the road could be to Billy. In the show, however, she’s just the other woman, and Camila is the wronged party.

Beyond Daisy Jones, scripted series about musicians or the music industry seem allergic to being about, well, music. Empire was more about the psychodrama playing out in one powerful family; Nashville was kneecapped by distracting plots, including one about a mayoral race, despite launching a bevy of well-written tunes. Roadies, the Showtime dramedy from Cameron Crowe, once a master chronicler of the ups and downs of band life, also rarely focused on the roadies themselves.

Creating music can come with high stakes. The songs Daisy and Billy write and sing draw from their own intimate lives yet get played in stadiums full of strangers. The novel takes care to explore the effects of making such soul-baring work. Reid writes of Billy’s controlling tendencies, including his habit of reworking his bandmates’ instrumentation without their knowledge; she details how pivotal their tour manager, Rod (Timothy Olyphant), and their producer, Teddy (Tom Wright), are to their stratospheric success. The show, though, overlooks the band’s artistic clashes, underuses Olyphant and Wright (along with much of the rest of the well-cast ensemble), and never questions how much Billy and Daisy place their star power ahead of the band’s overall happiness. The act of writing and recording songs is relegated to dull montages of the cast scribbling notes, plucking strings, and nodding their heads to a beat.

Midway through the season, Daisy and Billy do share a rare scene of working together, meticulously going over the lyrics they’ve written. She suggests replacing the word it with us to tighten the song’s focus and give it a personal bent. The simple change transforms the track and deepens the pair’s bond. We get to see how the music directly affects their relationship, and vice versa. “It’s quite a feeling when it works,” Billy remarks. If only the show tapped into that feeling more often.